2G18

Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 6:54 pm Post subject: 2G18 - 31: Political parties

Basic question: would we be better off without political parties in our democracies? In a sense, every single politician running as an independent? Or can you think of really compelling reasons for maintaining them? As far as I know, they exist in every democratic government.

Discuss.
_________________

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 5:53 pm Post subject:

Such a hot Hot Topic I have started.
_________________

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:17 pm Post subject:

Answer: Yes. The political parties are effectively large special interest groups. They do not reperesent the interests of the majority of their members other than by the bare minimum of negation of the alternative. It's difficult to prevent them from coming into existence though.
_________________
The TBB offers you tea and biscuits. teatime

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:26 pm Post subject:

You could... make them illegal?
_________________

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 7:00 pm Post subject:

It would be difficult to differentiate between political parties and any kind of organizing in the pursuit of shared goals. If you get rid of the latter you effectively get rid of democracy altogether. One thing you could do though is to make it illegal to run elections according to political party. So the parties can exist but they don't govern the way elections are run. No R's and D's on ballots. No party based primaries determining who appears on the ballot. Basically let them exist but neuter them.
_________________
The TBB offers you tea and biscuits. teatime

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 7:02 pm Post subject:

Yeah that does seem better than nothing. Shall we begin implementing these changes?
_________________

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 5:40 am Post subject:

There'd be a hell of a lot of independent politicians if there weren't parties. The thousands of slight variations on the same views and policies would probably confuse most people too.
_________________

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:18 am Post subject:

I think we should just emulate chairman mao and have one giant party! 🎉 🎈 🎊
_________________

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2018 10:27 am Post subject:

Even without parties, a lot of people would create largely meaningless distinctions to avoid having to exert a lot of brain power being informed on policy and candidate positions. Identity politics will still exist without official groups because we're still dumb apes that have barely gotten the hang of sapience and are still trying to decide whether to ask for a receipt for evolution's relatively new gift of abstract thought. Hell, we even have unofficial distinctions within and outside of parties (In the US, see RINOs, blue dog democrats, Ross Perot, Bernie Sanders, John McCain, etc.)

That being said, they still need to die because they're a huge waste of money and the strong organizational ties, pledges of party loyalty, etc. make unenlightened self-interest and corruption an endemic certainty rather than an ever-present danger.

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 4:21 pm Post subject:

To be honest, I think representative government is kind of shit anyway. Think about how long it takes representative bodies to do anything and then tell me we can't do this shit by direct democracy.
_________________
The TBB offers you tea and biscuits. teatime

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 6:03 pm Post subject:

I was thinking something similar recently. Representative government does seem kind of shit. However, I think the age-old question is “what would actually work better?” You know... in detail.
_________________

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 6:16 pm Post subject:

Direct democracy seems like it'd be prone to oppressive majority rule.

I wonder how federal civil rights legislation would have shaped out under direct democracy 50 years ago.

Not that it would be all bad, but there's a lot of low information voters that could swing the outcome based not primarily on weighing contemporary knowledge, evidence, and societal vs individual risk/benefit, but more on emotional appeals and inherent cognitive biases.

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 6:41 pm Post subject:

While that’s hard to argue against, I’m not sure representative government is really a great barrier to the same basic problem?
_________________

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 7:58 pm Post subject:

Not a great barrier, not even a minimally sufficient one, but like a foot-tall privacy fence, it's a barrier.

If only there were a system of government that largely eliminated the problems of under-representation, bureaucratic delay, and uninformed, vote-eligible stakeholders.

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 8:11 pm Post subject:

Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:41 am Post subject:

I wouldn't mind having the option to have national referendums during regular elections, that could be interesting for key issues.

Although we also just saw how that can go to crap with Brexit. Sad

Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:00 am Post subject:

You could argue that Brexit was driven by party politics, though?
_________________

Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2018 3:06 am Post subject:

I don't see how you couldn't, but a purely representative democracy will still have identity politics factor prominently into voting decisions.

I should probably clarify that I'm not necessarily advocating for any particular form of government other than democracy, broadly speaking. As to which manifestation is probably best overall, I don't have a firm opinion because my assumptions about how an ideal government should operate are often confounded by my skepticism of human judgement and rationality.

Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2018 10:45 am Post subject:

The best form of government would somehow overcome or cancel out human idiocy.
_________________

Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:28 pm Post subject:

Let's be real though. Representative democracy doesn't solve the idiot voter problem. We just deal with the idiots tjeyv oted for instead. At least direct democracy largely solves the corruption problem of representative democracy.
_________________
The TBB offers you tea and biscuits. teatime

Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:47 pm Post subject:

I started reading this “book” (really just an essay, it’s probably no longer than a long-read article on a news site):

So far it is well-articulated! You can download an epub of it here:

https://libcom.org/library/abolition-all-political-parties-simone-weil

Shall we book-club it in this thread?

_________________

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:46 pm Post subject:

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:54 pm Post subject: Re: 2G18 - 31: Political parties

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 2:23 pm Post subject:

Institute term limits for congress and/or get rid of electing legislative officials altogether and adopt a system similar to jury duty. Most people won't want to be there any longer than they need to be and might actually get shit done rather than covet their position/title for decades.
_________________

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 3:02 pm Post subject:

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 11:19 pm Post subject:

The Supreme Court should be ThunderDome. Two lawyers enter, one lawyer leaves.
_________________
The RDM has been right: 261,888,403,527,033,189,124,446 times‼
Club